AIR TRANSPORT
HUSHKITTED AIRCRAFT - Council conclusions 29 avril 1999
The Council decided to postpone the adoption of this Regulation until
29 April 1999 at the latest, and adopted the following conclusions:
"The Council of the European Union notes that its common position on
the Regulation for the registration and operation within the Community
of aircraft re-certificated to meet the ICAO Chapter 3 certification
standards by means of adding hushkits or by means of re-engining
aircraft with old technology engines with low by-pass ratios has been
approved by the European Parliament and is due for adoption.
The Council therefore declares its intention to adopt this Regulation in
due time and not later than the end of April 1999. This postponement
will allow the Commission to continue its consultations with the
United States and would permit, if the results are satisfactory, the
adoption in parallel with the Regulation of a declaration outlining the
content of an agreement with the United States on the next steps to be
taken. This declaration should cover:
- A strategy for reaching a new noise certification
standard as soon as possible, including a phase-out plan
for hushkitted and re-certificated aircraft with low
by-pass ratios, to meet the environmental aims of the
Regulation;
- And possible proposals for implementation of any
agreement with the USA that the Commission would be
invited to make as soon as possible in the framework of
the decisional procedures of the European Community."
LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) - The European Union Thursday confirmed its
decision to delay the entry of a controversial new aircraft noise
law for one year following intense U.S. pressure.
EU diplomats said industry ministers from the 15-nation bloc
rubber stamped the ban at a meeting in Luxembourg. "It's gone
through as an 'A' point (without discussion)," one said.
EU ambassadors and the European Parliament agreed Wednesday that
the proposed law to restrict the use of older aircraft fitted
with noise mufflers or "hushkits," should take effect a year
after its formal adoption instead of on April 1, 1999 as first
planned.
The EU concession defuses a disagreement with the United States
that had threatened to escalate into a nasty trade war.
Europe has pledged to continue talking to the United States about
ways to amend the law, which Washington says discriminates almost
solely against U.S. firms such as Boeing Co.
The law was supposed to ban the addition of newly hushkitted
aircraft to national air registers beginning this month and,
starting in April 2002, prevent the use of noise-modified
aircraft from outside the EU that are not currently operating in
the bloc.
It will now apply a year after its adoption, giving companies an
extra year to introduce newly muffled aircraft in the European
Union.
Washington said the ban was designed specifically to disadvantage
U.S. companies, and would bar some aircraft that meet current
international noise norms, because it is based on a technical
standard rather than purely on noise levels.
The United States estimates American firms could lose as much as
billion and Congress was considering a ban on Concorde flights
in retaliation.
The EU introduced the measure to reduce noise around Europe's
congested airports, after negotiations on the next generation of
quiet planes became bogged down in the International Civil
Aviation Organisation.
(C) Reuters Limited 1999.
REUTERS NEWS SERVICE
**************************************
EU BOWS TO US PRESSURE ON AIRCRAFT HUSHKITS
ENDS Daily - 30/04/99
The EU has postponed for one year a planned regulation that would
have frozen the number of aircraft fitted with special noise reduction
equipment, or hushkits, entitled to use its airports. Taken by
industry ministers in Luxembourg yesterday, the decision ends months
of speculation over whether the EU would bow to pressure from the USA,
which has campaigned against the measure.
Only recently EU transport commissioner Neil Kinnock stated publicly
that the regulation - which had already been delayed for one month to
give time for negotiations between the EU and the USA - would
definitely come into force on 1 May (ENDS Daily 19 April 1999). But
when ministers adopted the regulation yesterday, they also delayed
its implementation until 29 April 2000.
The apparent U-turn is a result of concerted lobbying by the USA,
which accused the EU of erecting a trade barrier against its older
jets - many of which are reaching the end of their commercial life in
the US and are destined for export. The USA used a combination of
threats of retaliatory trade action if the EU went ahead with the
measure, and a promise to cooperate to get a new, stricter,
international standard on aircraft noise if it delayed. The
US commerce secretary, William Daley, said yesterday that the US
would now work to reach "a common understanding on the remedies to
[the EU's] noise concerns".
The European Parliament reluctantly agreed to the date change as the
"best worst option," according to a parliament official. Although
MEPs could have vetoed the modification to the agreed text, under
procedural rules this would have blocked the regulation in its
entirety.
The delay was immediately slammed by ACI Europe - the trade body that
represents Europe's airports. Director general Philippe Hamon said:
"European citizens living near airports will have to suffer
unnecessarily another year of unlimited growth in the number of
noisy hushkitted aircraft". The trade body is pushing for quieter
aircraft to offset public fears about noise from traffic growth in
western Europe. ACI's own figures show the number of commercial
civil flights in principal European airports rose by over 5% in the
last year.
Contacts: EU Council of Ministers (http://ue.eu.int), tel:+ 32 2 285
6111.